Outfitter and Hunter Expectations

 April 29th, 2010

Outfitter and Hunter Expectations

Author: Richard Bailey, Outfitter/Owner

Turtle River Whitetails

Meadow Lake Saskatchewan

As a professional outfitter for whitetail deer in Saskatchewan I saw the need to write a short article about what to expect from an outfitter and what an outfitter expects from his clients.

Turtle-River-Whitetails

Numerous articles have been written about this subject already but I think some important points have been forgotten. One of the most critical things an outfitter can do to make sure his clients have not only a good hunt but an enjoyable experience is to inform his clients about what type of conditions they will be hunting in so they will come prepared. Here in Saskatchewan our temperatures can vary from as warm as mid 60’s to as cold as minus 35 degrees F in November. After a long ride into a stand the last thing a hunter wants to do is start out an all day hunt chilled. The best cold weather clothing is windproof/waterproof material. Insulation is also important but not as critical as stopping the winds from sapping your body heat. The right combination of insulation and windproof/waterproof material will ensure you will stay comfortable. The next thing to think about is a hat made of the same materials. Most of your heat is lost through the top of your head. If we know one of our clients has a problem staying warm we recommend purchasing The Body Heater Suit and we will also provide a propane heater for them to use.

I consider a hunt to be a partnership between the hunter and the outfitter.  When an outfitter has done his job correctly it is up to the hunter to carry out his part of the partnership. A hunter needs to be able to shoot properly. Good outfitters will have put in many hours of hard work and the last thing they want to happen is a lost animal because of poor shot placement. There is nothing more disappointing to both parties than a poorly placed shot.  The hunter needs to have enough confidence in his weapon of choice to know he will be making the shot placement adequate or do not attempt the shot.  I do not expect my clients to have the skill level of a sniper but I do want them to be able to shoot good enough to make sure they can do their part. There is not a good excuse for a poorly placed shot in my opinion.

Turtle-River-Whitetails2

Hunters are paying for the service of the outfitter and therefore have the right to ask as many questions as they want to. No question is unimportant enough to overlook or not ask. Never be embarrassed about any question you may need an answer to. If questions are asked using respect an outfitter should be able to answer them so the client will be satisfied. Outfitters that use hype or tell the client what they think the client wants to hear should be avoided. We here at Turtle River Whitetails take great pride in being hardworking, friendly and most importantly, honest with our hunters. Always ask for the information of unsuccessful hunters as well as the successful ones. Most hunters that have been successful will give the outfitter raving reviews because they were successful. As a potential client you deserve to know what the unsuccessful hunters have to say as well. If the hunter finds an outfitter he can trust the hunter should stay with that outfitter.

Some outfitters will offer discounted hunts just to fill up. I personally would never go with an outfitter that does not treat all hunters as equals in every way. Showing any type of favoritism is unethical. How would you like to be the hunter that paid full price only to find out the hunter sitting next to you paid less? A fair way of picking stands gives everyone equal opportunity. Just because a hunter happens to represent a TV show should not have any bearing on which stand he hunts at.

Good communication between the outfitter and his clients will be beneficial to both parties. That way no one will get unexpected surprises. I tell my hunters “I want you to get a buck more than you to” and I really mean that. My success depends on my hunter’s success and I take that very seriously.

A satisfied hunter is the best advertising an outfitter can get.

Turtle-River-Whitetails1

As you have read the hunt is really a two-way street between the outfitter and his client. If both parties have done their respective parts a successful and enjoyable hunt should take place. The pictures that accompany this article with attest to the fact both parties were satisfied.

Turkey Hunting Multiple States

 February 24th, 2010

Chasing Toms Across State Lines

By Shane Simpson, Owner www.TurkeyHuntPublicLand.com

south-dakota-turkey-hunter

Why would anyone want to hunt turkeys in another state? I used to ask myself that very question until I moved to Minnesota. Then the question quickly changed to, why wouldn’t you want to hunt turkeys in another state? Don’t get me wrong, Minnesota is a great place for chasing big toms, but with a one bird limit, a lottery system for licenses and a 5-7 day season for each hunter, it’s definitely not my first choice. That honor would have to go to my home state of South Carolina. Its season lasts up to 49 days, with a limit of 2 gobblers a day and a total of 5 gobblers per season. What if you’re not fortunate enough to live in an area with such a long season and liberal limit or what if you’re after a sub-species of turkey not found in your state? If this describes your current situation, as it does mine, then it may be time to cross the state line. But wait, before you pack all your gear into the truck and start logging hundreds of miles, there are a few things you will need to do. First of all, you will need to decide which sub-species you’re going after or which state you would like to hunt, where you will hunt once you get there and more importantly, where will you stay? I could go on and describe in detail the different sub-species of wild turkey, give you a list of the more favorable states and places to hunt and all the other details involved with an out of state hunt, but since most people have access to the best resource for such information, right here on the Internet, I will leave that research to you and simply describe how I prepare for one of my trips as an example.

The Choice Is Easier Than You Think

Which sub-species I hunt is of little concern to me so I merely have the decision of which state to hunt. I really enjoy road trips and if I have enough time, I will drive to my hunting destination rather than fly. How much time I have available dictates the farthest point at which I can drive to hunt. Most folks work during the week so I’ll use a weekend trip as an example, and since I currently reside in Minnesota, we’ll use that as the starting point. From my home in St. Paul and according to online maps, I can make it well into South Dakota, Wisconsin, and Iowa, Nebraska or Kansas in 10 hours or less. Now this really opens the door for more turkey hunting opportunities but because of the long drive, you will have to sacrifice some sleep in order to make it happen. Let’s see what each state has to offer. Wisconsin, Iowa and the prairie region of South Dakota all use a lottery system for their turkey season while you can purchase an over-the-counter tag for Nebraska, Kansas, the Black Hills region of South Dakota and for anywhere in South Dakota if your using archery equipment. If Wisconsin has any tags leftover after its lottery process, and it usually does, it will offer the tags to the general public in late March. For the sake of this scenario, we’ll say that I forgot to apply for a South Dakota or Wisconsin tag and since I don’t want to wait until March to plan my hunt, I can either shotgun hunt in Nebraska, Kansas, the Black Hills of South Dakota or all of South Dakota with archery equipment. I’ve yet to harvest a turkey with a bow, never shot a Merriam turkey and since South Dakota is the closest state with over-the-counter tags, well you see where I’m going with this.

The World at Your Fingertips

Now the fun part begins. I’ve picked South Dakota for my weekend hunt, but I can’t just drive around hoping to find suitable public land to hunt once I get there. That would just waste a lot of time and fuel. I need to do some research first and a great starting point is the Internet and to be more specific, a hunting travel site like NextHunt.com or the South Dakota Game and Fish Department (http://www.sdgfp.info). There you will find the state’s hunting rules and regulations, downloadable maps of walk-in-areas, wildlife management areas and other public hunting grounds as well as maps of the wild turkey’s distribution and population densities throughout the state. Through my research, I’ve discovered high turkey densities and abundant public land along the Missouri River near Bonesteel, SD. This will be my starting point and this is where Google Earth comes into play. If you’ve never used any of the online tools that Google (www.google.com) has to offer, then you are really missing out. One of those tools, Google Earth (http://earth.google.com/), allows users to view and download high resolution, satellite images of just about any location in the world and get this, it’s free. Once you are satisfied with the results on the screen, you can simply print the image or save and transfer it to your favorite GPS device for later use in the field. If you’re looking for first hand knowledge of a particular area, then an Internet hunting forum or hunting trip reviews are another great resource. Although the members of most forums are reluctant to share intimate knowledge of their so called “honey hole”, they will share enough about a particular area to steer you in the right direction.

south-dakota-turkey-habitat

Hotel Or A Motel? Who Cares!

I’m like most public land hunters that travel out of state, when it comes to a place to spend the night. I don’t care how small the room is, how hard the bed is or if it offers a continental breakfast. I just want a cheap place to shower and catch a little shut eye before the next hunt, which always seems to come too soon. In most areas of the country, finding a place to stay is no problem. Just travel along any main road and before long, you will see a billboard pointing out the nearest hotel chain. This is not the case in some areas of South Dakota, where most of the hotels that can be found are Mom and Pop outfits that do not advertise but are very inexpensive. A simple sign on the roof is usually the only indication of its existence and if you do manage to find one, good luck getting a room as many are booked throughout much of the season. Once again, you’ll need to tap that endless resource, the Internet, to locate a hotel and book your room in advance and even the smallest hotels can be found with a few mouse clicks.

The End Result

The preceding was almost the same process I used when planning one of my out of state hunts last season. I say almost because the one thing I didn’t do was locate a hotel before hand. I was fortunate enough to notice one across the road when I stopped, a few miles from my destination, at a small service station to refuel. Fortune smiled on me again when the booked hotel suddenly had a vacancy. Seems that another hunter had filled his turkey tags the day before and he was heading home early.  After securing my room, I quickly headed to my hunting grounds and right away I started seeing turkeys. This is going to be easy, I thought. Seems that I’m not very good at predicting the future because those turkeys, even though they answered every call I threw at them, were not easy and led me all over the countryside. At least I knew where they would be roosting the next morning. How quickly I forget that I can not see into the future. The nearest gobbling must have been a mile away from where I thought they’d be. After 2 hours of creeping, slipping and crawling along fence lines and ditches, and using the map I’d loaded on to my GPS weeks earlier, I was back in the game and nestled among several large, cottonwood trees less than 100 yards from the birds. The sun was just starting to burn off the morning fog when I made my first calls, a few loud yelps that were quickly answered by a hen and her toms. It took less than a minute for the entire flock to cover the distance, but unfortunately, the gobblers stayed in the heavy cover along the creek and sent that hen in to investigate. I don’t know what she was saying to the others, with her high pitched yelps and cuts, but it must not have been good because the rest of the flock remained hidden as they slowly drifted away. After spending the rest of the day trying to get back on those birds to no avail, I was left with an unused tag and an 8 hour trip back to the Twin Cities.

south-dakota-hen-turkey

Was It Worth It?

If you have to ask, then you were not paying attention when I mentioned that I really enjoy road trips. The road trip alone was worth it to me and the turkey hunt was an added bonus. Although I didn’t harvest a turkey, the experience was very gratifying and I would definitely do it again. Now if you want to put an actual monetary value on the trip, then this is what it breaks down to:

Fuel: $95.00

Food: $50.00

Non-resident turkey license: $85.00

Lodging: $30.00 a night.

The total amount spent on this turkey hunting trip was $265.00

Since I did not tag out and wouldn’t have to pay the license fee again, any future trips would cost $180.00. Not a bad deal, especially if you can get a buddy to go with you and share the expenses. If there’s one thing I can predict, it’s that I will make a return trip this spring!

Guided Hunts: What kind of camp is right for you?

 January 22nd, 2010

There can be extreme differences in hunting camp accomodations. Know what you are getting into before you book. Don’t overlook transportation during the hunt either,  hunting from a 4×4 truck is not the same as backpacking into and out of the wilderness.  Here is an overview to help you with your research. When taking a hunting trip, like everything else in life, you get what you pay for.

Hunting Lodges-For hunters who prefer comfort above all else, there are many beautiful lodges that also have great hunting, five star meals and superb accomodations.  Hunting lodges are often located on large private ranches. If the ranch is managed for quality animals hunters can have the best of both worlds, excellent accomodations and lots of trophy game to hunt. Transportation around the ranch is generally by 4×4 trucks. In addition to the big game hunting lodges often have other activities such as fishing and upland game available if you happen to tag out early.three-forks-lodge-colorado

Base Camp- Outfitters commonly set up and equip multiple wall tents ahead of time in predetermined areas. Assuming the outfitter’s equipment is in good working order this can be a comfortable camp for most hunters willing to “rough it” a bit. Food is kept in coolers, cook stoves are propane,  tents are heated with wood burners, a hole is dug nearby for the “toilet”. Many wilderness hunts for Elk and Mule Deer on public land are set up this way. Often times these base camps are many miles from the trail head to get away from the crowds. Access is typically a horseback ride into and out of camp. wall-tent-base-camp

Spike Camp- This is a small tent and freeze dried food, not much else. Outfitters use spike camps to stay on top of migrating game like Caribou, for remote wilderness area hunts or when dropping off hunters by plane. Spike camps are common for DIY backpack hunters on national forest or wilderness areas too. You need to be prepared for the weather conditions and in great physical condition to enjoy this hunt. That said, spike camps can be very successful.

Motels- Many outfitters call these “town hunts” meaning you stay in town in a local motel or bed and breakfast and drive to your hunting location. This is common for western hunts for game like Antelope, Muleys and Whitetails. Your meals are at restaurants or a sack lunch.

Boat hunts-These hunts take place from lakes, rivers and oceans and can be very effective at getting hunters on game. In North America outfitters use large 40-60 foot boats to hunt coastlines for Alaskan Brown Bear, Grizzly Bear, Black Bear, Sitka Blacktail Deer, Mountain Goat and Moose. These boats have all the comforts of home, plus fresh seafood like crabs and fish are caught and served.  Boat hunts can be a good alternative for those who don’t like riding horses or backpacking.boat-hunting

Getting around…

Backpacking-This is the most rugged hunt and should only be considered by those who are in excellent physical condition. Backpacks are heavy, weighing 50-70lbs. and terrain is steep, rugged and remote. Most likely a spike camp awaits you, possibly already set up or you may pack it with you.backpacking-out-muley

Horseback Hunting-Horses can be a super asset for getting into remote country, but hunters may spend a lot of time in the saddle.  It’s common for hunters to leave camp hours before first light and ride to the hunting area in the dark. Be sure to ask the outfitter how much riding to expect before you book with him. To many hunters, including the author horseback riding in God’s country is part of a great hunting adventure. However, if this doesn’t sound like an adventure to you, don’t book this type of hunt. If you book, try to do some riding before you go. Get familiar with horses and basic horsemanship skills. Riding can be dangerous, especially in the mountains.horseback-into-huntingcamp

Vehicles- Outfitters who hunt private ground will often use 4×4 trucks and ATV’s to access hunting areas. Clearly this is physically much easier on hunters. On the other hand, the overall experience is not the same, there is simply less adventure, which can be good or bad depending on the person.

Urban Wildlife Issues

 January 8th, 2010

Urban Wildlife: Issues and Management Solutions

 

Author: Todd A. Black

Utah State University Wildlife Extension

 

Jack H. Berryman a leader in wildlife management once said, “As the human population continues to grow and the competition for space and other resources increases, there will be more need for managing the damage caused by wildlife—the application of a wide variety of management, sociological, and economic tools to assure that wildlife resources remain an acceptable component of our national fabric.”

 

Urban and wildlife, some would argue that the two are an oxymoron.  How can something that is wild also be urban?     Urban areas by definition contain high densities of people.  Today, most urban areas contain locally and unnaturally overabundant wildlife populations.  With the creation of golf courses, landfills, agriculture areas, and back yard bird feeders, many populations of wildlife have reached artificially high numbers.  It could be argued that very few species of wildlife don’t come into contact with man and his environment at least once in their life time.  Certain avian and mammalian species have expanded their historical ranges and adapted rather well to this urban environment, while others have gone extinct or had their populations significantly reduced due to our increasing human populations and the demands this places on our natural resources.

These ‘urbanized’ species of wildlife can sometimes create nuisance situations such as a pesky raccoon who tips over the garbage night after night.  They may have an impact on human activities and livelihood like an irritated owl swooping down on passing bikers or an elk herd invading a farmer’s field.  They can create perceived threats to human activities like the mountain lions that come out and prowl our cities by night, or create real threats to human health and safety such as deer vehicle collisions, Lyme disease and rabies.  These wildlife conflicts affect someone everyday in a many different ways. 

In many urban areas deer, birds, geese, mice and rats, and even some predators lessen the quality of life for many ‘urbanites’.   It has been estimated that more than 70,000 human injuries, 400 fatalities, and over 3 billion dollars in economic losses occur annually due to human wildlife conflicts, the bulk of these occurring within the urban environment.   The fact is our expanding population is increasing demands on our natural resources and the ever diminishing land base.  This in turn increases the pressures and impacts placed on wildlife populations.  Hence, the interests of man and the interests of wildlife often collide usually to the detriment of both but more often than not, our wildlife looses the battle.

In Utah, the species which has become the most well adapted to our urban setting, expanded and increased its range like no other, and causes most of the urban wildlife problems is the Raccoon (Procyon lotor).  Interestingly enough the raccoon is not native to Utah and not protected by any wildlife laws and is now plentiful throughout the state.  Raccoons to most people are pest plain and simple but there are those who think they are cute and cuddly and often keep them as pets.  Studies conducted 10 years ago in Utah showed that 80% of the raccoons tested had been exposed to rabies.  In addition to causing damage to gardens, fruit trees, and the chicken’s in farmer John’s chicken coop, raccoon’s feces quite often carry the roundworm egg which can be transferred to humans.

How do we deal with and manage urban wildlife?

Perhaps the biggest challenge to wildlife managers and state/federal wildlife agencies today is dealing with the urban wildlife interface.  How we manage these species often results in conflicts with the public depending on our personal belief system and the interest we may have and how we view the welfare of individual animals.  Most states have specific rules and regulations as to how they and the public can deal with ‘urbanized’ wildlife.  These rules and regulations are driven by a myriad of issues but are often influenced by emotional and social issues rather than biology.

Most states discourage the feeding of wild animals and in some states feeding of big game animals is against the law.  Yet millions of dollars are spent annually on bird feeders, bird seed, deer pellets, bird baths, squirrel house, bird houses and other wild animal attractants.  A big question that has been asked by many researchers is what effect these artificially high or unnatural populations of wildlife are having not only on humans but other wildlife particularly those adjacent to the urban environment. 

Feeding birds in the back yard has greatly increase local urban populations of the house finch.  Other than building a nest in the occasional wrong place, the increasing house finch population seems to have little if any effect on other species and causes few human conflicts.  Members of the corvid family (ravens, crows, and magpies) have also adapted well to the urban setting however, these species are adversely affecting many other species of wildlife that are found in and adjacent to the urban environment.  Recent research has shown corvids to be having a significant impact on sage-grouse and other ground nesting bird eggs in upland environments adjacent to urban areas.

Management of urban wildlife is complex.  No two individuals let alone species are the same and different management practices are employed for various species.  In Utah for example, certain species (bear, mountain lions, and moose) are often tranquilized or trapped by state wildlife agencies and relocated outside the urban area.  However, many of these individuals become habituated and often return causing further problems.  More often than not, they usually end up being extirpated.  Other big game such as deer and elk urban conflicts are dealt with through some means of hunting where specific animals or localized populations are targeted for removal through harvest where population numbers can be kept low or removed completely to further avoid human conflicts.  Dealing with ‘pesky’ animal (starlings, skunks raccoons and squirrels) problems and issues are usually not even dealt with by state wildlife agencies but are left up to the homeowner to deal with individually or hire a private pest control business to remove or exterminate the problem animals.  Quite often we create our own problems.  We feed animals, provide habitat where animals can obtain shelter and cover or simply don’t maintain our homes and yards to avoid these conflicts.    

 What can we do?

 The demands for viable solutions to ‘urbanite’-wildlife conflicts are constantly increasing and we must expand our efforts, education, and means to deal with these issues.  Solving these conflicts will continue to place a tremendous management challenge for state and federal wildlife biologist for the foreseeable future.  Balancing the biological and social dimensions of urban wildlife issues will require capable, credible, and professional wildlife agency personnel.   

We need to be better educated in how to avoid and further urban wildlife conflicts.  Most state agencies and Extension services provide educational material to help us better understand and deal with urban wildlife management conflicts and issues.  Further, when dealing with these issues we as the public must realize the conflicts and see these problems and urban wildlife for what it really is.  Not always are there going to be no simple solutions to this complex problem.  Only by realizing the role we play and the importance of keeping these animals wild will we are able to fully understand and manage urban wildlife.

Mule Deer Hunt and Harvest Strategies

 January 8th, 2010

This is a thoughtful look at the way state agencies regulate mule deer hunts, permits and the critical importance of habitat. The way a state manages their deer herd has a direct coorelation to quality and quantity of deer you will see and so does the habitat. Depending on your hunting goals you need to keep all this in mind when picking the state you plan to hunt.

Author: Todd A. Black, Biologist Utah State University Wildlife Extension

 

 

In case you have not heard me say it before, I will say it again; habitat is ‘A number one’ if we are to have a healthy and stable mule deer herd in a given area. More often than not, habitat is often overlooked. For the most part we are quick to blame other things when we are discussing our decreasing mule deer numbers. We should all realize that habitat includes more than just the groceries on the table and water to drink. It includes escape cover both from predators (four legged and two legged) critical secluded fawning areas, and non-disturbed, not fragmented breeding areas. There is no doubt in my mind if we had perfect habitat and perfect conditions everywhere mule deer numbers wouldn’t be in the state they are today. Without a doubt if you have all these critical habitat components, likely you will have good deer numbers. If on the other hand, one or more of these are lacking, you are likely to have problems. My question is, can anyone show me on a large scale where this perfect mule deer habitat place exists? I think if the truth were really known, there aren’t too many places out there that don’t have some major habitat issues. At least that is the feeling I get when talking to the state agencies across mule deer country. Alright, enough said on habitat, I think we all realize that there are some problems out there that need to be addressed. I hope we are all working towards addressing some of these issues and fixing the problems. While we are working/waiting, let’s talk about the hunt, the harvest, which ever you prefer.I have heard it before from my fellow biologist, read it in articles, even read it in the so called professional papers. ‘The number or ratio of bucks to does is unrelated to the number of fawns hitting the ground the next year’. Now I would have to agree that if we had perfect habitat in our given area, if we didn’t hunt bucks from August to November, if we didn’t have antlerless harvest, there just might be something to this statement. However, I find it hard to believe that we can have low buck to doe ratios, have fragmented and poor habitat, have unlimited buck harvest, be killing does because of depredation issues, constant recreational/hunting activities, and not have some effect the number of fawns hitting the ground next year. Also, let’s not forget that the bulk of the ‘research’ we are basing all this information on was done 20-40 years ago. Back then mule deer numbers were way up there. Additionally, recreational uses of mule deer country were less, technology in bigger and better weapons and optics were certainly not what they are today, and don’t forget there were less elk out there as well.Today, hunting season lengths and hunter days afield might vary from state to state. If you were lucky enough to draw tags in every state, you could hunt mule deer from the first part of August and hunt through the end of December without missing very many days. Typically state agencies use harvest of mule deer as a means of management and keeping numbers in check with habitat conditions. Often though, mule deer hunting is overlooked as a means of population control and more of a much needed source of revenue. I believe many state agencies because are faced with the decision of how many dollars can be generated from the sale of mule deer tags as opposed to what areas do we need to reduce harvest or cut numbers back. For many years, state wildlife agencies derived much of their annual budget off the sale of mule deer tags. As such it is often difficult if not impossible without other funding mechanisms to cut back and only use mule deer hunting as a means to control and keep numbers in check. Additionally, mule deer hunting and ‘how many to harvest’ decisions is based on the need to satisfy demands of hunters for more deer and more opportunity to hunt deer. With these types of demands, the real management and conservation of the species more often than not gets put in left field. Having said all that, I will say that many of the states are now cutting back on the allocation of tags. In 1994, Utah cut their number of tags in half. More recently Colorado went to a limited number of tags as well. While I believe these are steps in the right direction, I think we have to ask if it is enough and what can we do to more adequately address conservation than just the selling of permits.

Virtually every type of hunt, season length, weapon restriction and choices that can be thought up have been tried in one state or another. Some have been done long enough to see valid results one way or another. Others are not tried long enough to be proven or non-proven means at all. Those that seem to work the best, that is to increase buck to doe ratios and allow populations to be managed at or near carrying capacity are those that have a limited number of tags and or those that have a shortened season that is early enough in the year as to not effect the rutting activities of mule deer. Those that do not work are ‘antler point restrictions’ this type of hunting scenario has been tried in several different states with basically the same results. It just doesn’t work.

So what does work? Not all mule deer hunters are trophy hunters, not all are meat hunters. Studies have shown that most are people who like to get out and hunt and enjoy the company of family and friends while being in mule deer country. Most would obviously like to see a buck or even have an opportunity to take a deer but for the most part, they just want to be out and about. Not every unit/region/area/zone needs to be managed for maximum sustained yield and not every area needs to be managed for trophy animals. We shouldn’t be selling permits just to be generating income from wildlife. What ought to be done is this. Every unit/region/area/zone should be managed for something measurable when it comes to mule deer management. These measurable objectives should be those types of things that can withstand the test of time. Deer population management objectives must be clearly defined in all aspects from January to December. This includes appropriate hunting seasons, weapon restrictions/choices, population objectives, antlerless and buck harvest objectives. These objectives should be very specific as to habitat, environmental conditions, and social as well as mule deer carrying capacity. These measurable objectives need to be determined with input from local game managers, land managers, public land users, concerned public, and sportsmen. ‘If it isn’t good for the people, it isn’t good for wildlife’. State and federal land managers need to have these objectives addressed in their regional land use plans so that mule deer management becomes a priority. Most important is that these objectives need to be closely monitored over long periods of time and be flexible enough that if changes such as weather or events that significantly change the habitat the objectives can change as well. We shouldn’t feel like we have got to hunt and kill a deer every year or we will die either. We all need to be flexible and open in our management and ideas.

In my travels to most mule deer states these past few months I firmly believe that the local biologist have the management of mule deer high on their ‘to do list’. They need our help, input, and support. Let’s stop thinking of ways we are going to harvest and kill deer and start thinking and working towards ways we can ensure they will still be around in 50 years.

Antler Growth 101

 January 7th, 2010

Todd A. Black, Biologist with Utah State University Wildlife Extension posts the following overview on antler growth.

 

I would imagine just about everyone has read or heard about everything there is to know about antlers and how antlers grow.  However, ever so often I get asked what I think contributes the most to antler growth and what causes antlers to be bigger or smaller from year to year. Most everyone realizes that genes and nutrition play a major part as well as age but for those of you who don’t—here you go.

This last year was a great example of extreme antler growth throughout the west. There were more than just a handful of 200 class ‘muleys’ and a grundle of 400 class bulls harvested last fall. This all happened during one of the worst drought years on record. So why the drastic change and why so different from last year? Basically, there are three different things that contribute to antler growth and all three are important when considering the whys and why ‘nots’. In no particular order they are; genetics of both the buck and the doe, age of the buck, and condition of the range or the quality and quantity of available green groceries. Some may argue that one is more important than another and in some instances that may be the case. Certainly there are areas where no matter how old a buck gets and no matter how much you feed him, he’s just not going to be a 200 class buck. In this case genetics are the missing link. I maintain that in order to truly grow a big mule deer, you have to have all three.

Age–age is the easiest to control at least in theory.  If you want to have older bucks you simply control the harvest rate such that you limit your take on younger deer.  Most studies have show that a mule deer buck reaches its prime somewhere around 5-6 years old. In some cases it’s a bit later but not too often much earlier in its life.  Typically, older bucks will almost always have heavier antlers than younger bucks.  Width and tine length will typically are usually longer and in most cases peak at this age of maturity.

Given the liberal harvest that most states employ it’s highly unlikely that general open seasons are going to have many or should I say a majority of older bucks harvested on any given year. I would guess that most general season areas on average harvest bucks between 2-3 years old. However, several states are now starting to look at managing their ‘limited’ harvest units to some age class on buck deer. Many of these are managing for a certain age class of bucks which is determined by the average age of buck taken through harvest and tooth analysis. If certain areas are exceeding the age class objective, more permits are usually given, if they are not meeting this age class objective permits are usually reduces the following year(s) until age objectives are being met. As a biologist, I can’t imagine a better way to manage a deer herd. As a hunter these are the areas I want to spend my time and money on.

Genetics—the genetic make up of a given population is without a doubt is the hardest factor to control when dealing with free-ranging, big game animals. This is largely due for the simple fact that game managers don’t have the ability to isolate and control certain genetic traits expressed by antler growth. Another factor here is the females in the population. I often here the argument that if we just eliminate those ‘bad gene’ bucks or those ‘genetically inferior bucks’ we will improve the number of ‘trophy’ bucks in a given area. I have to bite my tongue most of the time when I hear this. Most anyone who has a basic understanding of genetics knows the major flaw with this argument. It is; if you don’t know what genes are being expressed or can’t control what genes are being contributed by the does (does usually out number the bucks 8 to one on average) then there is no way you are going to be able to get rid of those ‘bad gene’ bucks, unless you eliminate all the does as well. When it comes right down to it, you either already have good genetics in the local population or you don’t.

Range condition—the condition of the range also greatly influences antler growth.  So much of an animal’s life is dependant on its ability to obtain the vital nutrition it needs from the range. Yet we often overlook the importance of quality range lands. Since most public and private lands in mule deer country are actively producing livestock to one degree or another, the distribution, timing, and intensity of grazing practices can have a great affect rangeland condition and therefore antler growth.  Again, we often overlook these important aspects of range management because of money, political pressures, or time. Too many animals, whether wild or domestic, will result in decreased antler growth and could reduce the animal’s fitness and reproduction rates as well.  When considering antler growth, we must remember that antler growth is secondary to body care and maintenance. What does this mean? If range conditions are poor, animals are usually in poor health and body condition is usually poor and antler growth will never be maximized under these types of conditions. Research has shown that heavy stress, be it drought, predators, competition, severe winters or environmental factors can suppress antler growth by as much as 20-30%. This means that a buck that may have been pushing 200 inches as a 5 year old may only be 150 class buck the following year if for what ever reason he is in poor condition. A perfect example of this is a deer my dad shot a few years ago. The buck came from a good genetic area he was a 6 year old deer but range conditions were poor it had been overgrazed and was in a drought year. The deer appeared to be in poor condition (ribs, hips, and backbone were showing) and upon field dressing showed little or no body fat. The buck had some mass but spread, tine length and main beams were short and the buck squeaked out a mere 160 B&C.

One of the positive thing about range condition is quite often it can be improved and even controlled some what that is if you take out the drought factor, nothing we can do there. However, given a little money and time, the range can be improved.  This is perhaps more evident and easy to show on a small scale such as a small ranch or a certain drainage rather than over hundreds of thousands of acres. Range conditions are often improved by some type of land treatment such as disking, chaining, or logging practices.  Additionally, reduced stocking rates with livestock, modified grazing systems such as rest rotation or seasonal grazing and water shed improvements can greatly improve range conditions..

Quite often, if the range is in poor condition land mangers have been know to augment antler growth with some sort of mineral supplement. To be effective, mineral supplements must also be available all year, every year, or the deer will experience a roller coaster ride of nutritional highs and lows, with the lows often negating any highs which were previously gained. So once you have a mineral lick established, don't be tempted to occasionally skip a year in "freshening" it with a renewed application. Maintaining a lick costs an average of only $15 per year and requires less than 15 minutes of work- each lick will adequately serve 40 acres of deer habitat. One common thread with mineral supplement is people expect to see overnight results when it often takes years to really make an improvement with your population. Always remember that minerals first into body growth and maintenance. Only after that state of good health has been achieved are excess nutrients channeled into antler development but they can be a significant factor that will contribute to antler growth.

Know you know all you need to know about antler growth so get out there and watch them grow.

A note on supplements can be broken into two groups of minerals, macro and trace.  Macro minerals are those minerals which are needed in large amounts of the animal’s diet.  Macro minerals include calcium, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, sodium and sulfur.  Trace minerals are those which have been shown to be needed when supplementing an animal’s diet.  The seven trace minerals are iron, copper, zinc, manganese, cobalt, iodine and selenium. Extreme care must be taken to assure minerals are in proper balance.  Too much of one interferes with absorption of another. Essential minerals alone are often poorly palatable.  A pelletized feed is your best assurance against nutrient and mineral sorting.  There is a wide range of mineral supplements available on the market today.  Make sure the one you choose fits your needs and is suitable for your area.

Antler Growth and Droughts

 January 7th, 2010

Antler Growth and Drought

 Todd Black, Biologist with Utah State University Wildlife Extension provides this insightful look at how droughts can impact antler growth. This can be especially important information to consider when you have accrued many years of bonus/preference points for that trophy hunt of a lifetime and are planning your hunt.

“The past few years have been drought years, but I feel the springs have been wet and feed plentiful. It seems conditions don’t get poor until animals are hard horned. Yet, in some videos I’ve seen, they are talking about drought causing poor growth? Also, when do deer and elk hit their prime in antler growth and then start to digress.”

 Kevin

Thanks for the great questions Kevin—

The second part of your question regarding when ‘deer and elk hit their prime and then start to digress’ is really quite variable and depends on many different factors. However, the general rule of thumb that you typically hear and is supported by some research is that deer reach their prime in antler growth and maturity some where between 4.5 and 7.5 years of age. Often they will continue to get more massive and more points (if it has the genetic make up to do so) but maximum tine length typically occurs at some point during that three year period. Elk are a bit different—often peak tine lengths in elk can occur as late as 10-11 years but more often occurs between 6.5 and 8.5 years of age. Again, the bull will typically continue to grow mass and get more ‘massive’ as it gets older up to 12 and 14 years of age in limited and non-hunted areas. Having said this, there are many factors which may extend this growth and our definition of ‘prime’. Nutrition and genetics are just as important as what type of stressors the animal may occur throughout its life. How actively it will participate in the rut, where it fits in the dominance hierarchy, how many predators are in the area, how hard the area is hunted, where it lives, and what kinds of extremes it will encounter from the weather can all play a significant roll in how its antlers grow and when they will peak in growth.

To address your first question regarding antler growth, is a bit more complicated, hence all the confusion, theories, and tall tales we all hear. The truth is after many years and all the research done with ruminant animals, even on white-tailed deer, the nutritional needs that mule deer require to grow antlers still aren’t very well understood. However, there are a few things we do know with a fair amount of certainty.

First, in order to function and survive, antlered animals require nutrients from five groups just like us only a bit different. They are; 1–crude protein, usually 12-14% of their diet needs to be protein for optimal body maintenance and antler growth.  Any more than this is typically discarded and can often cause digestion and bowel problems.  2–energy (taken from digestible matter) the amount of energy or biomass a deer has to take in really varies from season to season and from location to location. In early summer a buck deer may only have to feed a couple of hours during the day where as in winter months it may be twice to three times that amount.  3–minerals (calcium and phosphorous) often overlooked and quite often lacking in the diets of many deer. This is why old salt and mineral licks are often dug down several feet in the ground. Deer crave these minerals and if obtained in sufficient amounts, can greatly affect antler growth. 4–vitamins equally as important as minerals but more readily available in the vegetative matter deer eat. 5—water, often water is obtained from vegetative matter and a big buck may only water once or twice a week depending on existing environmental conditions.  Often times during a drought mule deer have been observed eating larger quantities of evergreen drought-resistant plants. These plans usually have less available nutrients and energy and can take more energy to digest than the deer may obtain from these types of plans. Of these five basic requirements, protein, minerals, and energy are the needs that most typically would limit not only antler growth but rut activity and post rut recovery by the bucks during long winter months also can impact antler growth. These (protein, energy, and minerals) are obtained from the deers diet and the vegetation it consumes every day. Most deer require about one and a half-two tons of groceries per year to maintain optimum health know as ‘fitness’ and grow big antlers.

Second, we also know that nutritional needs of the antlered animals vary by season, geographic location, and species. Most of this variation can be contributed to the various physiological changes the deer may go through throughout the year. For a mule deer buck to grow big antlers, it is essential for the nutritional composition of the vegetation to be is optimum throughout the year.  During the antler-growing season (April—July), the vegetation must be high in proteins and provide essential vitamins and minerals.  During the late summer and fall seasons and even through early spring – the vegetation need to be high in carbs providing the deer with the needed energy levels to maintain and sustain its fitness throughout those long winter months.  If it isn’t ‘fit’ he will come into the antler growing season in sort of a nutritional deficit and it will require more food and more minerals and more energy to get him back to where he was coming into the winter. Similarly, if nutrition is poor in the summer months, he will come into the winter months in poor condition as well and the deficit could potentially even be bigger.

For nearly four decades, Dr. George Bubenik a professor of zoology at the University of Guelph zoology professor at the University of Ontario Canada like his father Tony Bubenik has been studying deer and antler growth and likely knows as much as anyone about the subject. He concludes that the three things most responsible for quality antler growth and growing big antlers are nutrition, genetics, and the lack of stress.  Research has shown that deer will produce smaller antlers the following year if they are under stressors from the lack of quality vegetation, water, hunting pressure, and pressure from the rut. These same bucks were kept at a lower level in the dominance hierarchy even though they were older bucks and bigger the previous year. Additionally, stress lowers the testosterone levels that are critical for good antler growth.

Third, prolonged periods of drought, like the drought periods we’ve seen in recent years, can have devastating effects on fawn survival and overall deer numbers over time.  On nearly all deer ranges in the western United States, the availability of green groceries is the most critical element in antler growth and development. We all know that overall, mule deer numbers are down largely because they are not in balance with available food resources. This lack of quality green groceries leads to inadequate nutrition and causes poor body conditions, reduced reproductive efficiency with the does, and often undesirable antler characteristics. Often with yealing bucks, the percentage or relative number of spikes is used as an indicator of nutritional conditions. The more spikes counted or harvested during a given year is usually a good indicator of a lack of green groceries. Continually high numbers of spike deer usually indicates a serious habitat issue and habitat deficiencies.

The executive summary is this—drought does effect antler growth. Precipitation directly effects vegetation growth and the quality of that vegetation. The nutritional quality of the vegetation will have a direct impact on the health and fitness of deer and elk and studies have shown that drought can reduce antler growth as much as 10%. That may not seem like a bunch but it takes a 200” record class buck down to a 180 class buck, still no slouch but it does have an impact none the less. The hardest part with regards to antler growth is we really can’t tell or predict how much a deer would or could grow from year to year even if conditions were optimal. Generally, the larger body a mule deer has, the larger its’ antler size; but feed intake per pound of body weight decreases along with overall metabolic rates during times of stress and drought.  I don’t recall any research being done or that has been done that would suggest that drought isn’t a major factor affecting the growth of antlers, especially if it occurs during the critical antler-growing season of April through July.

Another thing to remember is that the effects of antler growth are not always seen in the year the drought occurs, it may take a year or more of drought to adversely effect antler growth. Now having said all of that, remember that there are always exceptions. There may be certain individuals or localized populations that have adequate sources of water (springs etc. just as you mentioned) where the impact may not be as bad or even noticeable. I have noticed over the past few years, that the timing of what little precipitation that falls is equally important on antler growth.

Apply for Non-Resident Tags This Year!!!

 January 5th, 2010

Tim Seitzinger, co-host of Big Horn Outdoors TV provides this insightful post on non-resident licensing and tag draws. Check out their show on the Pursuit channel or visit their website at http://www.bighornoutdoors.com/.

 

Want to know the secret on how to afford a world class big game hunt? Wouldn’t it be great to hunt public land out west with little to no pressure? Dreamed of maybe getting a real chance at a true trophy buck or bull? If you answered yes to any of these questions, maybe this is your year to get into the non-resident tag draw game!

 Most hunters find the draws complex and intimidating, and many just don’t know where to begin. This can be the case, but with a little research and effort 2010 could be the first step towards hunting opportunities that you’ve always dreamed about.

 Most western states allocate big game tags by using two main systems during their draw. The first being a bonus point system. This system works by providing hunters who don’t draw a tag with a point. Each year you properly apply and don’t draw the tag you receive one bonus point. For example, first year of draw 1 point, 2nd year 2 points, 3rd year 3 points, So on the third year of applying you would have three chances at drawing your tag instead of one!

 The second system is a preference point system. This works the same as each year you properly apply you gain one Preference point. The main difference is the applicant with the most points gets preference for the tags available. For example two hunters apply, John has 4 point and Mark has 7 points, Mark will draw the tag!

 Most western states also put a cap or limit on the number of tags that non-residents can draw. Allocations of these tags runs between 10% to 20% of the total number tags available. This is the state’s way of making sure most of the hunting is done by residents.

 In addition, some states require non-residents to purchase a non-refundable hunting license to apply for the limited entry big game unit tags and build points. In some cases this can get a little expensive so if you are on a budget be selective with your states. Focus all your efforts on a couple until you draw. Examples of states that require you to buy a hunting license to accrue points are Arizonia at $151.25 and Nevada at $142.00.

 Most, but not all, states require you to pay for the cost of the tag at the time of your application. They then hold your funds anywhere from one to four months. After the drawing if you are unsuccessful they refund the tag cost minus nominal applicaton fees.

Some states offer such as Wyoming a bonus point only drawing where you can purchase one point a year that can be used in draws in future years. Lastly, be sure to review any state’s game and fish site and rules and regs before applying for tags.

 The following Big Game draw deadlines are fast approaching, don’t miss them!

 Arizona:   Elk and Antelope

Wyoming: Elk

Utah:  all Big Game Species

 Maine mooseNow is the time to start planning for that hunt of a lifetime. Here is a picture of a bull I Harvested in Maine back in 2005 on a tag I drew. The cost to get in the draw was $10.00 The non-res tag was $450.00. Successful hunt of a lifetime for a big bull Moose, priceless! YOU COULD BE NEXT!

 

At NextHunt.com our mission is to help hunters plan and take the perfect hunting trip.

2010 Western Hunting License Applications Available

 January 3rd, 2010

If you want to hunt the best trophy units in the midwestern or western states this fall make plans now to apply for your non-resident license. For example Arizona and Wyoming have open draws now for certain species. Be sure to check out the game and fish department’s website for the 2010 rules and regs in the states you plan to apply. Every year there are important changes you should be aware of that may positively or negatively effect your hunting plans. Even if you aren’t able to hunt this fall do yourself a big favor and buy a preference or bonus point if available. It’s the least expensive way to improve your odds for the trophy hunt of a lifetime.

Check the Hunting Trip Blog regularly, we have more info coming soon!

United Airlines Changes Policy on Shipping Antlers, Horns and Skulls

 December 16th, 2009

Here is the latest statement just released today from United Airlines on plans to revise their policy on shipping Antlers, Horns and Skulls.

From United Airlines
Dec. 16, 2009

Hello All -

As you have recently contacted us, I wanted you to be the first to know that we have heard our customers’ feedback about our Antler and Animal Horn policy, and are responding.  Soon we will begin accepting Antlers and Animal Horns as checked baggage again.

As many of you may recall or have seen on our Web site, in October 2008 we stopped accepting Antlers and Animal Horns because of the damage the tips caused to the cargo section of the aircraft and to the luggage belonging to our other guests.

We will soon publish new requirements – and ones we previously did not have – about packaging and cleaning Antlers and Animal Horns to ensure their safe, clean transport. These travel requirements will also provide information on the size of Antlers and Animal Horns we can accept based on the type of aircraft being flown (i.e., traditional jet vs. a regional jet) and the special handling fee, which we previously had in place and is similar to other items that require special care.

Stay tuned for further updates on the baggage section of united.com.

If you (media members) have any questions, please let me or my colleague Sarah know.

Kind Regards,
Robin Urbanski
United Airlines